Also note that the company has only boosted the maximum core clock speed of the FX-8370 by one tick—100MHz, to be precise—over the 2012-era FX-8350. It Depends on the App, Intel Optane SSD 900P Series (280GB) Review, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Founders Edition) Review. That really leaves the 125-watt FX-8370, while by no means a bad chip, as the odd chip out, unless it sees a price drop. FX 8370. Geekbench 5 scores are calibrated against a baseline score of 1000 (which is the score of an Intel Core i3-8100). So while the AMD FX-8370 managed to best the 95-watt AMD FX-8370E, it lagged more than a minute behind the older (and now cheaper) FX-8350. Uses much more power than comparable Intel chips, which also have on-chip graphics. The RX 480 is the first graphics card to feature AMD’s new 14nm Polaris architecture. Overview Prices Specs + Add to comparison. Iar rezultatul este impresionant: 8.7 GHz, adica un spor de frecventa de 112%. It's a decent option for those with an AMD … AMD FD8370FRHKHBX 4 GHz FX-8370 Octa-Core Desktop Processor with Wraith Cooler, Black Edition Visit the AMD Store. Problem with dfi infinity ultra a+ sound ?.. ), While we're happy to see AMD launch new chips in the neglected FX line, the AMD FX-8370 is much less a new chip than it is the slightest possible speed bump over a chip that's been around for two years. This documented on the AMD nomeclature for AMD FX8300 series. Find out which is better and their overall performance in the CPU ranking. Air cooling is going to lower your overclocking margin just due to the heat these chips will shed when overvolted. These days, the Handbrake test we've been using the last few years (run under version 0.9.8) now takes less than a minute to complete with high-end chips. (It involved the rendering of a 5-minute video to an iPhone-friendly format.) It was the best you could do without jumping to the new-and-pricey X99 platform, spearheaded by the company's eight-core monster processor, the Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition. Helpful. This real-world test, in which a short video file gets crunched down to a couple of file formats, maxes out all available cores, and so it often shows multi-core, multi-threaded processors in their best light…. The data on this chart is gathered from user-submitted Geekbench 5 results from the Geekbench Browser. There are also 15 Vishera parts, that work in the same socket. Backing down to 5.015GHz at 1.475v got the FX-8370 fully stable and gets the chip right in the 5GHz range for less coin than the FX-9590. FX-8370 ajunge la 8.7 GHz August 30, 2014 AMDNici nu a ajuns inca pe piata, si procesorul FX-8370, varful de gama desktop de la AMD, a fost luat la o tura de overclocking extrem. The FX-8370E, which is also priced at $199.99, is worth paying a little extra for if you care about lower cooling requirements and power draw, because of its lower 95-watt TDP. As such, the day in day out setting for the FX-8370E is more along the lines of 4.99GHz using up to 1.5v. The FX-8370 containts 4 modules, 8 Cores with a 4.0GHz frequency that can be boosted to a 4.2GHz frequency. Given the small performance increase the FX-8370 is over the FX-8350 and the price difference the 8350 is a better buy. And while chips like the Intel Core i7-4770K and the more recent Core i7-4790K haven't broken major new ground in terms of raw performance (ignoring their integrated graphics, for the moment), time has allowed Intel to widen its already strong performance lead. 11,583. It's a decent option for those with an AMD AM3+ system to upgrade, but the FX-8350 remains, arguably, a better value. Comparing the voltage applied for both chips, it's clear that the same overclocking experience will get you pretty close to the maximum clock speed using an AIO liquid cooling solution. AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core benchmarks, AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core performance data from OpenBenchmarking.org and the Phoronix Test Suite. - Duration: 10:57. Note that all of these chips are based on the same Piledriver architecture found in the AMD FX-8350 and certain other, lower-end FX processors that have been around since 2012. Style: FX-8370 with Wraith Cooler Verified Purchase. Two FX-9000 chips rolled out to modest fanfare in 2013, in the form of a top-end FX-9590 and a step-down FX-9370 variant. © 1996-2020 Ziff Davis, LLC. It's designed to max out the CPU with a multi-threaded workload and show its pedal-to-the-metal potential. With four Piledriver modules you thus get eight logical CPU cores. AMD chips may have more cores, but in tests like this when you're leaning on only one, lower-priced Intel options can and will often perform better. Sorry for the inconvenience. AMD FX-8370 Piledriver je nejvhodnější do základních kancelářských počítačů nebo sestav pro opravdu nenáročné uživatele. Keep in mind, though, that it's possible to damage your CPU when overclocking, so be sure to keep your thermals in check and proceed slowly. We'll see the same dynamic in our next test. It easily outpaced the Intel Core i3 and Core i5 competitors, while getting nearly within striking distance of the much pricier Core i7 chip. This chip is a bit over $300 but represented, at this writing, the high end of Intel's mainstream chips. Only minimally faster than FX-8350, which is $20 cheaper. The 2nd generation FX series processors have been built upon what you guys know as the Vishera architecture, all managed on the very same 32nm fabrication node. Those chips—and indeed, all of Intel's current line of mainstream "Haswell" and last-gen "Ivy Bridge" CPUs—have the added advantage, like AMD's A Series APUs, of integrated, on-chip graphics. AMD’s three new FX processors are here: the FX-8370, FX-8370E, and FX-8320E. A pair of them are eight-core, 95-watt chips, collectively dubbed the "E Series": the AMD FX-8320E ($146.99), and the AMD FX-8370E ($199.99). (The FX-9000 series chips practically require one, so you'll have to supply your own with those chips. en. This chart compares the AMD FX-8370 with the most popular Processors over the last 30 days. With its 4GHz core clock speed, which can step up to 4.3GHz automatically when all cores aren't being taxed, the FX-8370 is a reasonably good performer for the price when it's running software that can take full advantage of all eight cores. 10:57. To get fully stable at this speed required more voltage than the Corsair H100i could shed before throttling the clock speed. It taxes all available processor cores and threads while rendering a complex image. (The closest "easy overclockers" in Intel's line are the Ivy Bridge-based Core i5-3570K (on the LGA 1155 socket) at around $230, and the Haswell-based Core i5-4670K (LGA 1150), at around $240.) Čip dá dohromady 8 jader a patřičný výkon pro rychlý chod počítače přinese frekvence 4 GHz.Ve větší zátěži se automaticky přetaktuje na 4,3 … A graduate of the first class of the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism, his work has appeared in Popular Science, Consumer Reports, Smithsonian, and elsewhere in the ether. GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs. For those looking for maximum performance within a not-outrageous power envelope, though, it's the third one, the 125-watt AMD FX-8370 (no "E") that will be the most interesting of the lot. AMD FX-8370 Review AMD FX-8370 review is temporarily unavailable. PCMag, PCMag.com and PC Magazine are among the federally registered trademarks of Ziff Davis, LLC and may not be used by third parties without explicit permission. The hubbub around these chips centered mainly on the AMD FX-9590, and AMD's claims concerning its raw clock speed. Jerry Neutron 66,062 views. Here, we render a standard 3-minute-and-15-second video clip to a DVD-quality format. Search. 9,946. Style: FX-8370 with Wraith Cooler FX-8370 with Wraith Cooler. Please have a look at the die … Matt is a self-described Net nerd, gadget geek, and general connoisseur of off-kilter culture. (The other AMD FX chips here were tested using single-fan watercoolers with smaller, single-fan radiators: either an AMD stock watercooler from the early days of the FX-8000 series, or an Antec Kühler H20 620.) Here, the FX-8370 again ran essentially even with the FX-8350 and FX-8370E chips, and it wasn't all that much faster than the company's high-end APU, the A10-7850K, which sells for about $20 less and includes very good integrated graphics. Get it from Steam. Core i7 875K. Categories. ), How to Free Up Space on Your iPhone or iPad, How to Save Money on Your Cell Phone Bill, How to Find Free Tools to Optimize Your Small Business, How to Get Started With Project Management, How to Build a Maxed-Out Intel Coffee Lake Gaming Rig, Report: Apple Is Testing a Chip Design With 32 High-Performance Cores, First Tests: AMD’s Ryzen Threadripper Pro, New Muscle in Workstation CPUs, Despite 7nm Struggle, Intel to Keep Investing in 5nm, 3nm Chip Technologies, Which CPU Should You Buy? Your subscription has been confirmed. AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors. We're not entirely sure why, but Intel's QuickSync dedicated video conversion tech may have played a role on this test (and elsewhere), giving the Core chips an edge. AMD flaunted the CPU's 5GHz clock rate in turbo mode, a speed plateau it called a first among consumer CPUs. Last, we ran our Sony Vegas Pro 8 video-rendering test. I rebooted the system and sure enough this energy conscious chip responded with perfect stability at a much cooler operating temperature than the FX-8350. The base clock speed of 4GHz remains the same between the two chips. GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs. But those looking for a new chip from AMD that has power requirements more in line with comparable Intel chips will want to look to one of the two new 95-watt FX E-Series parts instead. If you click an affiliate link and buy a product or service, we may be paid a fee by that merchant. Given that the FX-8370 is built around the same architecture of the FX-8350, and both chips share the same 4GHz base clock speed, we weren't expecting much in the way of performance surprises. AMD FX 8370 4.0ghz/Turbo 4.3ghz Read more. But especially given the higher TDP of the FX-8370 and FX-8350, you may want to use a self-contained liquid cooler, as we did in our testing, to make sure the chips run at optimal speed when maxing out the cores for more than several minutes at a time (say, when crunching videos or rendering 3D images). A nyolcmagos processzort fejlett, 32 nanométeres gyártási technológiával készítik, amelynek köszönhetően sikerült javítani a feldolgozás hatékonyságát, sikerült a teljesítményt megnövelni és csökkenteni a hősugárzás mértékét is. It was launched in September 2014 and is both cheaper and faster than the FX-8350. At $199.99, the AMD FX-8370 will sit above the older FX-8350, which has now dropped in price to $179.99. Various Video Game Stories from the Week of December 7, 2020, Various Video Game Stories from the Week of November 30, 2020, Various Video Game Stories from the Week of November 23, 2020, Various Video Game Stories from the Week of November 16, 2020, Various Video Game Stories from the Week of November 9, 2020, Various Video Game Stories from the Week of November 2, 2020, Various Video Game Stories from the Week of October 26, 2020, AMD Officially Announces Radeon RX 6000 Series, First GPUs Coming November 18, Hard Drive: Corsair Force GT 240GB SATA 3, Memory: Corsair Vengeance LPX 4x4GB 2800MHz, AMD FX 8370 & FX 8370E Testing: Setup & Overclocking. As a result (and as you'll see in our testing), there's little reason to upgrade if you already have a fairly recent, high-end AMD FX CPU, such as the AMD FX-8350 or FX-8320. Platform. AMD FX-8370 Revisited 2017! That said, it's still a good value if you don't care much about power consumption and are looking to step up from an older quad-core AMD FX CPU. As for Team Intel, we chose representative Core i3 and i5 chips, the dual-core Intel Core i3-4130 (around $119) and the quad-core Core i5-4570 (close in price to the FX-8370, at around $199.). We compare the specs of the AMD FX 8370 to see how it stacks up against its competitors including the AMD FX 8350, Intel Core i5 4690K and AMD FX 8370E. AMD FX 8370 : Report a correction: CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD FX 8370 vs the Intel Core i7 875K. Core i7 875K. And in one sense, it does, easily finishing the test faster than any Intel chip here, save for the $340 Core i7-4790K. To refresh, both Intel's and AMD's recent processors employ a turbo mode, called "Turbo Core" in AMD's case and "Turbo Boost" in Intel's. FX-8370. (We've got that chip in for testing, as well, and are working on a review. Gift Guide. Reasonably priced for an eight-core, 4GHz chip. AMD FX-8370E - Benchmark and Specs compare with other CPU Cinebench R15 (Single-Core) Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Introducing The AMD FX-8370E. That eliminates the extra expense of a separate graphics card if you're not a gamer or other user who needs a dedicated card. Benchmarks Real world tests of Core i7 875K vs FX 8370. I also running 32 GB of Kingston 1866 (8GBx4… We also tried testing the FX-8370 with the Deepcool double-wide radiator to see if more robust cooling made a difference here, but it didn't affect the result. On the consumer-processor front, ever since the debut of its eight-core AMD FX-8350 CPU in late 2012, AMD has been emphasizing its lower-end APUs—what it dubs "accelerated processing units," processors with graphics acceleration built in—over its more traditional FX line, which lack on-chip graphics. We compared the AMD FX-8370 to a pair of AMD processors we're also currently reviewing (the lower-TDP AMD FX-8370E, the family-leader AMD FX-9590), as well as against its AMD FX-8350 forebear and the company's top APU at this writing, the A10-7850K. smartphones smartwatches headphones tablets. The 8370 can handle a pair of 1866, but with 2 pairs you have to set it at 1600 Mhz. In September 2014, though, AMD announced a trio of brand-new FX-8000-series chips that will work in mainstream AM3+ motherboards. And all of the Intel chips did better here, likely partially due to the fact that this test is essentially made up of several small tests, with brief stops in between. (But really, he prefers the low-tech scenery of the Scottish Highlands and the hills of Japan. Christmas shopping discountsView deals. And one of its advantages over some comparable Intel chips is that it's unlocked for easy overclocking, while comparably priced Intel chips aren't. Its effective speed is 83 which is currently only exceeded by AMD's 20% more expensive FX-9590 (scoring 85), making it relatively good value for money. Indeed, until we wrote this review, the company hadn't offered up any new processors in its FX-8000 line of enthusiast-grade silicon since that promising eight-core chip, which we gave three-and-a-half stars when we reviewed it back in late 2012. In the interim, we did see and cover the debut of some lesser FX chips, such as the AMD FX-4130 in early 2013, but the emphasis there was on lower price points. Next up, in our Photoshop CS6 benchmark test, the AMD FX-8370 again lost out to its predecessor. Aside from the clock-speed adjustments, and the 95-watt thermal design power (TDP) rating of the two E Series chips, there's nothing major that's "new" to talk about with AMD's latest FX chips. Each Vishera processor will have Piledriver units, or segmented modules. Share this page. Note that the FX-9590 did somewhat better here, but only when we strapped it to a Deepcool Gamer Storm Maelstrom 240 liquid cooler after getting subpar results with a single-fan watercooler. This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. AMD's FX-8370 desktop CPU bumps up its top clock speed a tick, offering slightly better performance than the now-aging FX-8350 in some instances. You'll often find him writing while walking on his treadmill desk, surrounded by heaps of consumer tech. 4 options from $275.00 . Home > CPU comparison > AMD FX-8350 vs AMD FX-8370. AMD's FX-8370 desktop CPU bumps up its top clock speed a tick, offering slightly better performance than the now-aging FX-8350 in some instances. The FX-8370 still has a 125-watt TDP, like the FX-8350. Results: Gaming Page 1: Introducing The AMD FX-8370E Page 2: Power Consumption At The FX-8370E's Stock Clock Rate Page 3: Power Consumption: Overclocking To 3.5 And 4.0 GHz Page 4: … Intel Core i5 vs. i7, How Fast Is Apple's M1 Chip? Turbo Boost will be disabled on all processors to make a fair comparison without skewing results. What is the difference between AMD FX-8350 and AMD FX-8370? PCMag Digital Group. Intel's chips did much better here because, clock for clock, they excel in single-threaded tasks versus AMD's current-generation architectures. At a basic level, both are the same thing: They enable the CPU cores to speed up a bit over the base clock rate when a task demands it and the heat-dissipation conditions allow (what the chip makers call the "thermal headroom"). Let's start with the FX-8370E. The consumer CPU market has changed a bit since then. 5.0 out of 5 stars Can't get any better unless it's ryzen. Shop By Price. (Check out our review of the AMD FX-8350 for a bit more on AM3+, chipset and motherboard issues, and the Piledriver architecture.). (Stay tuned for our full review of the FX-8370E, but you can see our testing numbers for that chip in advance on the following pages.). These clock speeds will represent the level of performance shown by the overclocked scores in the testing. Testing AMD's FX refresh CPUs, the FX 8370 and FX 8370E will involve running it and its comparison products through OCC's test suite of benchmarks, which include both synthetic benchmarks and real-world applications. Michael Otero. The smaller the overlap between the yellow and green bars, the better the value for money. That'll make any chip, even the mighty $1,000 Intel Core i7-5960X Extreme Edition, break a multi-threaded sweat. (Indeed, we suspect that the FX-8370 simply reflects better yields from the FX-8350 manufacturing process, with these chips being the same parts at heart, but the FX-8370 being selected ones that upclock better—a culling process known in the industry as "binning.") Compatible with older AMD AM3+ socket and motherboards. The company also made several older models more affordable. Also note that the pricing above includes boxed air coolers for the FX-8000-series processors. Boxed Processor Here today we are testing out the FX-8370 which falls right above the FX-8350 and below the FX-9370. This time, the FX-8370 bested its older sibling by a whisker. Plus, the FX-9000 series' high power requirements and need for robust cooling meant they would work in only a select few motherboards. It did, but it still lagged well behind even the Core i3-4130. Find out how your PC compares with the AMD FX-8370 with 3DMark, the Gamer's Benchmark. Sign up for What's New Now to get our top stories delivered to your inbox every morning. We also dropped in the numbers we saw from the Intel Core i7-4790K, popularly known by its code-name, "Devil's Canyon." Mushkin 993997 Redline PC317000 9-11-10-28 16GB, AMD FX 8370 & FX 8370E: Introduction & Closer Look, AMD FX 8370 & FX 8370E: Specifications & Features, AMD FX 8370 & FX 8370E Testing: Apohysis, WinRAR, Geekbench, Bibble 5, AMD FX 8370 & FX 8370E Testing: Office 2010, POV-Ray, ProShow Gold, HandBrake, AMD FX 8370 & FX 8370E Testing: SiSoft Sandra, AIDA64, AMD FX 8370 & FX 8370E Testing: Cinebench, X.264, PCMark 8, AMD FX 8370 & FX 8370E Testing: Metro: Last Light, AMD FX 8370 & FX 8370E Testing: Batman: Arkham Origins, G.Skill TridentZ Royal DDR4 3600 CL14 32GB Review. Appreciable improvements with multi-core software. COVID-19. Here, the AMD FX-8370 looked quite good versus the Intel-based competition. Applying a bit more voltage, it was able to post at 5.2GHz, but anything over 1.525v would not boot the system. AMD FX-8370 Benchmarks Benchmark results for the AMD FX-8370 can be found below. Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2017. Based on 85,613 user benchmarks for the AMD FX-8370 and the Intel Pentium G4560, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,276 CPUs. AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors. This test taxes only a single CPU core, as many older, staple programs do, thus exposing a weakness of AMD's current processor architecture. Get the best deals for amd fx 8370 at eBay.com. As a result, using the Handbrake app we've switched to a much more taxing (and time-consuming) video-crunching test using 4K video as the source material. For a quick and dirty start, I employed the BIOS save file I had for my FX-8350, which was a solid IBT-stable 4.7GHz clock speed save file. The latter issue remains with the FX-9000 line, but the pricing has changed, with AMD dropping the FX-9590's estimated selling price in September 2014 to a far more realistic $229.99. The FX-8370 is a top of the range black edition Vishera eight core processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. We continue to use it and report it because it gives a window onto performance with software that's partially, but not fully, threaded. And those who really care about power efficiency, and who don't often run media-crunching or -creation apps, will be better off with a midrange Haswell-based Intel chip, like the Core i5-4460, or the 54-watt-TDP Core i3-4360. So, aside from this pair of niche chips, the lack of new enthusiast-grade AMD CPUs has left Intel alone to rule the veldt of the consumer market for power processors. The thing is, for quite a time those FX-9000 chips were expensive and hard to find, with the FX-9590 selling for over $800 at one point—that is, if you could even find it. I've check your user benchmark and your ram speed is set at 800mhz even though it is a 1866Mhz type. So with a good air cooler or a self-contained liquid cooler and some patience, you should be able to get even better performance out of the FX-8370. Know, though, that its huge power and cooling demands mean it will remain a niche part, and nothing more, for the most intrepid PC power builders.). Using the "All CPUs" setting, we ran the POV Ray 3.7 benchmark, which challenges all available cores to render a complex photo-realistic image using ray tracing. Here, the FX-8370 managed to outpace the dual-core, quad-threaded Core i3 chip. Vishera was released back in October 2012 with the line up that includes: FX-8370, FX-8350, FX-8320FX-8370 in the AMD’s FX series lineup. This test is perhaps where the FX-8370 looked best. FX-8370 with stock fan. But again, it was only able to just keep pace with the FX-8350, a chip that's two years old and now costs $20 less. It will run that speed with as little as 1.475v, but is not fully stable at that point. Totul prin priceperea lui The The gaming tests will also consist of both synthetic benchmarks and actual gameplay, in which we can see if similarly prepared setups offer any performance advantages. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. To ensure as few variables as possible, all hardware will be tested at their stock speeds, timings, voltages, and latencies, unless otherwise stated. Given the FX-8370's higher boost clock rate (100MHz over the FX-8350's), we expected this to be a test where the FX-8370 set itself apart from the FX-8350. On the other hand, those building a new PC from the ground up—CPU and mainboard together—and looking for the best performance overall, especially when it comes to lightly threaded workloads, will still be better off considering an Intel chip, such as the like-priced Core i5-4570 or the pricier Core i7-4790K, since the Haswell/LGA 1150 platform has more potential CPU-upgrade overhead. Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). This is very simple, one Piledriver module basically has two logical AMD64 CPU cores tied together. So, while the FX-8370 is still a decent value if you often run software that takes advantage of all available cores, for most users the $179.99 FX-8350 will be a better value, given the $20 price difference. If you're planning on overclocking, you'll definitely want the extra heat-transfer ability gained from using a good liquid cooler. And you'll still need to be using a motherboard with a 900-Series chipset and the same AM3+ socket with these CPUs. We don’t have all the details yet but the RX 480 is rumoured to have an MSRP of $199 and it will likely perform on a par with the Nvidia GTX 970. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time. Most users looking to build an AMD-based system will be better off choosing one of those two alternatives. The base clock speed (4 GHz) is the same on both but the 8370 has a slightly higher "Max Turbo" (4.3 vs. 4.2) so this difference is very small. Next up was another aging test we maintain, a simple video-conversion test using Windows Media Encoder 9. The FX-8370 also couldn't outpace the $120 Core i3 chip here. In this test, we apply a series of filters to a stock image... Once again, the AMD FX-8370 managed to land even with the 95-watt FX-8370E, but the older FX-8350 again finished sooner. Holiday Gift Guide 2020. FX-8370 ... ©2020 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Footer Secondary. The AMD FX-8370 is a Socket AM3+ processor, based on Vishera core. Keep an eye on your inbox! Comment Report abuse. But the Core i5 outpaced the AMD chips, despite having only half the amount of cores or threads. We then switched over to our venerable iTunes Conversion Test, using version 10.6 of iTunes. Also, overclockability varies from chip sample to chip sample, so you may get lucky with a good chip that's capable of running stably at high clock speeds, or you may wind up stuck not far from the chip's top stock clock of 4.3GHz. 26 people found this helpful. Az AMD FX-8370 az új FX szériájú processzorok igen markáns képviselője. This kind of core-happy video conversion is where the AMD FX-8370 should shine. It easily outpaced the similarly priced Intel Core i5-4570. AMD Black Edition AMD FX 8370 / 4 GHz processor overview and full product specs on CNET. Its effective speed is 83 which is currently only exceeded by AMD's 20% more expensive FX-9590 (scoring 85), making it relatively good value for money. https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/amd-fx-8370. $369.86 . The display of third-party trademarks and trade names on this site does not necessarily indicate any affiliation or the endorsement of PCMag. 4.6 out of 5 stars 751 ratings | 379 answered questions Available from these sellers. The system will receive a fully updated, fresh install of Windows 7 Professional 64-bit edition, in addition to the latest chipset drivers for each board and GeForce drivers for the NVIDIA GTX 770. After stock speed testing, each processor will then be overclocked as much as possible, while still maintaining full stability. In this test, we updated to the latest revision of Handbrake (version 0.9.9, the 64-bit version) and tasked the CPUs to convert a 12-minute-and-14-second 4K .MOV file (Tears of Steel) into a 1080p MPEG-4 video. The card is due for release on June 29 (in four days time). But—our theory, anyway—when you're taxing all cores at maximum over an extended period, the thermal headroom narrows, keeping the chip's variable clock speed from ramping up quite as far for a sustained period. Home > Processors > AMD FX-8370 Review Last updated: UL Procyon. Well, we have our lineup and maximum stable overclocks for each respective CPU; time to see what results we get. For typical users however, the FX-8370 runs at 4.0/4.3 GHz (base/turbo) and typically hits 5.0 GHz when overclocked. Boxed Processor FX-8370 AMD $153 Bench 66%, 21,750 samples: 61x: GPU; GTX 1050-Ti Nvidia $155 Bench 31%, ... FX-8370, RTX 2070: Average: Battle cruiser - 66: 77: 54 72 89 74 - 52: $779: ... UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. With eight cores and a top Turbo Core clock speed (without overclocking) of 4.3GHz, AMD's new chip is a decent option for those who are building a new system, or looking to upgrade an existing PC that has an older FX chip and an AM3+ motherboard. We started off our testing with the synthetic Cinebench 11.5 test. PCMag.com is a leading authority on technology, delivering Labs-based, independent reviews of the latest products and services. But aside from our single-threaded iTunes test, which gives every advantage to the higher boost clock of the newer chip, the FX-8370 wasn't much faster in our tests than the FX-8350. Because of those pauses, the AMD chips don't get quite the advantage of allowing their extra cores to chew through a continuous, time-consuming workload. Our expert industry analysis and practical solutions help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology. But the Intel Core i3-4130 also did quite well, considering it sold for just $120 when we wrote this and has a 54-watt TDP that's less than half the 125-watt TDP of the FX-8370.