On top of that, they trade blows. The 2080 only has 8GB of RAM which is fine today but will likely haunt any early adopters that plan to keep the card for more than two years. Actually vega 64 is better performer than 1080. The system that I’m testing with has an Intel Core i7-9700K CPU @ Stock an Gigabyte Z390 Auros Xtreme motherboard, along with 16GB of RAM running at DDR4-3200 in dual channel. did you read different articles than i did? The Radeon RX Vega 64 Sapphire 8GB has 4096 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 1080 MSI Armor OC 8GB Edition has 2560. On a positive note, this translates to a much higher frame rate, so we're hardly complaining. Would have liked to see a 4GB card in the mix, and ideally even the 1060 3GB. New York, Base Clock 1247 MHz. Finally, the GeForce GTX 1080 causes slightly less host processing utilization compared to AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64 at a similar performance level. Why is Biostar Radeon RX Vega 64 better than MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Gaming X? Why is Gigabyte Radeon RX Vega 64 better than MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X? The GTX 1080 has 2560 Cuda Cores. 5.51 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance? Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 1080 Ti: 24% higher gaming performance. 01 December 2017. Moreover, the id Tech 6 engine does a fantastic job at implementing threading, as our 6C/12T Ryzen 5 1600X is used in a homogeneous manner. Gaming performance Steve from HardwareUnboxed and Techspot compiled a huge 32-game benchmark that we recommend for a deeper dive into the performance of all RX Vega cards. You will receive a verification email shortly. The performance of both these graphics cards in gaming is neck to neck. Assassin’s Creed Odyssey was tested with the built in benchmark using very high settings. Compare hashrate, power consumption, and profitability of different hardware. It is no surprise that these two beastly boards run Wolfenstein II in a perfectly smooth manner at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 with max'ed-out quality settings. But the GeForce GTX 1080 FE catches up at 1440p. Dell Inspiron 15 7591 vs Inspiron 15 7590: Which One is Better to Buy? Vega 64 has a three free game deal worth about $150, and a couple of models have a $30 rebate. So we could see how much VRAM is actually needed for solid performance. I thought it runs really well all maxed out. Please refresh the page and try again. Legal Disclaimer And Affiliate Disclaimer. the 3g 1060 takes a huge hit compared to the 6g. For me, I personally think it’s a tie between them. 2 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance? AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs RX 580: Which Should You Get? Personally, I will recommend you to buy RX Vega 64 because it is latest than GTX 1080. 0.79 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance? Visit our corporate site. It was rather linear. OnePlus 8 Pro Vs Realme X50 Pro 5G: Which is Better? Metro Exodus was tested using the replay feature with the exact same replay on both graphics cards. Nvidia GTX 1660 vs AMD RX 580: Which to Buy? By CoinDuckling369 October 8, 2017 in Graphics Cards. Thank you for signing up to Tom's Hardware. Go to solution Solved by AresKrieger, October 8, 2017. Bonus: Radeon RX Vega 64 vs. GeForce GTX 1080, both are listed as the minimum GPU needed for the game, HDMI 2.1 Turns Your TVs into a Gaming Monitor, Best Holiday Tech and PC Hardware Deals 2020: CPUs, SSDs and More, TeamGroup Enters DDR5 Validation Phase With Motherboard Makers, Cooler Master's ML360 Sub-Zero AIO Going On Sale for $349.99. Vega 64 has 4096 Streaming Processors. Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 64 has 4096 compared to 3584 in the Vega 56. However, Radeon RX Vega 64 is a bit faster than GeForce GTX 1080 but is slower than the mighty GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. vr; gtx1080; rxvega; Share Followers 2. Vega 64 performs closely to a GTX 1080, varying somewhat depending on the individual game and resolutions. Would have also been nice to see some actual CPU benchmarking, especially since the spread of minimum/recommended CPUs represents a very wide range (i.e. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon RX Vega 64 . Samsung Galaxy S20+ Vs iPhone 11 Pro Max: Which is Better Option? 2 TFLOPS höhere Gleitkomma-Performance? GTX 1650 Vs 1660 Ti: Which is Better for Laptop? If we talk about computational performance, then also Radeon R… Both these graphics cards can run latest games on Ultra graphics settings at 1440pand 4K resolution. Units. 1070, 1080ti) cards arent included. While actual performance stats will be known once the Vega 64 is available, AMD claims that the Vega 64 will hit between 53 frames per second to 76 frames per second, while gaming on a 3,440x1,440p ultra-wide monitor, while the GTX 1080 will hit … This is a game that I’ve found to perform better with AMD, however it also seems to do well with Nvidia graphics, so the result is a 5% boost to average FPS at 1080p with the Vega 64, rising to a 11% improvement at 1440p. The Radeon RX Vega 64 rivalled Nvidia's high-end GeForce GTX 1080 on its launch in summer 2017, but in the past eighteen months AMD's high-end Vega … It's only the benchmarks that count. With founder’s editions available at $449, compared to $470 for AMD’s recent Vega based RX 56 and $510 for the GTX 1080, the 1070 Ti represents good value for money. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). The GTX 1080 was again ahead here, though just 6.4% higher average FPS at 1080p and there was no difference at 1440p. At 1080p AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64 leads the pack followed by the RX Vega 56 and NVIDIA's GTX 1080 Ti. Let’s start out A Plague Tale Innocence, which was tested with ultra settings. Rage 2 was tested with the built in benchmark at ultra settings. More info on the RX Vega 64: More info on the GTX 1080: Benchmark PC Specs: AMD Motherboard: Ram: Cooler: Motherboard: SSD: PSU: Case: Me on Add us on google + Like us on our Page Credit: YouTube/MW Technology It depends on game you want to play. Ifu buy freesync monitor vega is worth it because freesync is 300$ cheaper than gsync. I don't know how they came to that conclusion that they did when the 8GB 390 did so well in the test. RX Vega 64. USD/kWh. For running latest AAA games on 4K, you might have to lower down some of the in-game graphics settings depending on how demanding the game really is. 12.66 TFLOPS vs 11.877 TFLOPS. level 2. alphakoala19. Just Cause 4 was tested using the built in benchmark with very high settings, and we’re seeing a 3.5% performance boost with the GTX 1080 at 1080p. AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64 posts a better frame rate at 1080p, averaging more than 120 FPS. Let’s start out A Plague Tale Innocence, which was tested with ultra settings. The clear winner is RX Vega 64. The rumored fast approaching release of Volta (NVIDIA’s next generation architecture following on from Pascal) in early 2018 may upset demand for the 1070 Ti. RX VEGA 64 vs GF GTX 1080 for VR RX VEGA 64 vs GF GTX 1080 for VR. The winner in this game is GTX 1080. Based on 816,243 user benchmarks for the AMD RX Vega-64 and the Nvidia GTX 1080, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. Dell Inspiron 15 (7590) vs XPS 15 (7590): Which One Will Be Better? Future US, Inc. 11 West 42nd Street, 15th Floor, Bonus: Radeon RX Vega 64 vs. GeForce GTX 1080. Warum ist AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 besser als Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti? Current page: Our utilization analysis confirms what we just saw in condensed form: mainly, Radeon RX Vega 64 is more hungry for CPU resources than the GTX 1080. Bench marked the Vega 64 gets around 50-60 fps on PUBG in 1440p on all ultra settings and ideally I would want at least want 80-90 fps (might be possible on the lower settings I play at). Most parts of the game perform a fair bit better than this, so don’t take these results as a good indication of what to expect throughout the entire game, it’s more of a worst case, it does however allow me to perform an accurate comparison. Here is our comparison between RX Vega 64 vs the GTX 1080. By using the Core i7-7700K and Ryzen 5 1600, each with the Vega 64 and GTX 1080 at 1080p and 1440p we have some very interesting results … Currency. there is a damn 1060 3g and several 4gb cards included in the test. 3.92 TFLOPS higher floating-point performance? Dell Inspiron 15 7501 vs Latitude 15 5501: Which To Buy? i have an ancient 920@3.5 and a gtx 970. Ivy Bridge Core i5/i7 CPUs & 4C/8T FX CPUs all the way up to current Ryzen CPUs), as well as some idea as to whether newer Intel CPUs have much of a boost over the 3rd/4th-gen versions. At 1080p the 1080 was just 13% ahead of the Vega 64 in average FPS, rising to a slight 19% improvement at 1440p. Why is MSI Radeon RX Vega 64 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080? Electricity costs. AMD RX 590 vs Nvidia GTX 1060: Which One is Better? NY 10036. something i noticed about this game. By In terms of average FPS the GTX 1080 is 4% ahead of the Vega 64 at 1080p, lowering slightly to an 1.3% lead at 1440p. 12.6 TFLOPS vs 10.6 TFLOPS However its not worth +150$ because advatage is symbolic between 2-5%. The architecture also employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). Specs. The winner in this game is GTX 1080p. Multi pools. Reward calculation Filter. AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs Nvidia GTX 1650 Super: Which to Buy? There was quite a nice improvement with the RX Vega 64 here, which was giving me 15% higher average FPS at 1080p, and 17% higher at 1440p. The 1080 as a Vega 64 loses to a stock 1080 in vr titles The World’s Best And Worst is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for website owners to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com and any other website that may be affiliated with Amazon Service LLC Associates Program. With alerts. Samsung Galaxy A50s Vs A50: Is it Worth Upgrading? x. VRAM utilization is imprecise because games can allocate a lot more VRAM than they really need. Overall both the graphics card are performing well. At 1080p there was a large 9.6% improvement to average frame rate with the RX Vega 64, rising up to a 14% increase at 1440p. Galaxy A50 Galaxy A50s BUY NOW BUY NOW PROS PROS Best display for the price.Design reminiscent of flagships.Low price.Solid performance. Dell Inspiron 15 7501 vs Apple Macbook Air: Which One is Better to Buy? Performance generally similar to GeForce GTX 1080. Bruno Cormier While there is almost no difference in CPU usage between these two cards at 1440p, the Radeon is noticeably more hungry for processor resources than the GTX 1080 at 1920x1080. I was a bit sad there wasn't a lot of openess though. Once again, host processing resources are well-utilized by the game engine. AMD RX vega64 vs Nvidia GTX 1080 ti 8GB Side by side comparison (1440p). Samsung Note 10 Lite Vs S10 Lite: Which is Better? Why is AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 better than Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti? 12.66 TFLOPS vs 8.745 TFLOPS Yannick Guerrini, RX Vega 64 vs GTX 1080. There was a problem. Edit. 75 watts lower power draw. Due to the fact that nobody knows when the prices will stabilize, we will compare the RX Vega 64 to both the GTX 1080 ($499 MSRP) and the GTX 1080 Ti ($699 MSRP). At 1440p both the graphics card were giving 70FPS, so the winner in this game is GTX 1080. Differences between these two cards practically evaporate at 1440p. But a Radeon Stream Processor (as … Lately the drivers have improved to the point that Vega 64 seems to beat the 1080 more often than not, not counting overclock variations and extreme cooling situations. Shadow of the Tomb Raider was also tested using the built in benchmark with very high settings, and with both resolutions, the RX Vega 64 was coming out 1FPS ahead of the 1080. At both resolutions there was no difference in average FPS. Now which is better and which to buy? Unfortunately for gamers and other consumers, AMD’s top end GPUs such as the Vega 64 still lag NVIDIA's previous flagship 1080 Ti by 30% so there is very little pressure on NVIDIA to offer better value for money. Hardware. Release date Q3 2017. If you were buying today let me know which card you’d pick down in the comments and why, the GTX 1080 or RX Vega 64. Our utilization analysis confirms what we just saw in condensed form: mainly, Radeon RX Vega 64 is more hungry for CPU resources than the GTX 1080. Wolfenstein was tested with the Ulletical FPS benchmark, and like many of my other comparisons there was less of a difference between the two here. The RX Vega 64 was actually ahead at both resolutions. World War Z was tested in the practice range as I can easily perform the same test run compared to playing with bots or other players which will vary every time. 13.74 TFLOPS vs 8.228 TFLOPS Radeon RX Vega 64 GeForce GTX 1080; GPU Name: Vega 10 (Vega 10 XT) vs: GP104 (GP104-400-A1) Fab Process: 14 nm: vs: 16 nm: Die Size: 484 mm²: vs: 314 mm²: Transistors The winner in this game is GTX 1080. Hitman 2 was tested in campaign mode rather than multiplayer, as it’s easier to consistently reproduce the test run. I could always downscale the resolution on the monitor to 1080 if I wanted more fps, but have heard that it isn't ideal. GTX 1080ti performs approximately 30% better than the GTX 1080, so about 30% better than the Vega 64 as well, varying slightly depending on the game and resolutions. Get instant access to breaking news, in-depth reviews and helpful tips. Tom's Hardware is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. The upside on RX Vega 64 is a lot higher than the upside of the GTX 1080, and I believe that we'll see similar improvement over time with Vega that we saw with the RX 480. (Detailed Comparison). The Division 2 was tested using the built in benchmark at ultra settings. Assassin’s Creed Odyssey. 2 years ago. Not sure why the RX 64 and GTX 1080 Benchmarks are separate as a "bonus"...and why other top tier (i.e. The same Windows updates and game updates were used for testing, and for drivers I’m using the newest available at the time of testing, 430.86 for the Nvidia GTX 1080 and Adrenalin 19.6.2 for the AMD RX VEGA 64, so let’s get into the results. © The winner in this game is GTX 1080. In terms of average FPS the GTX 1080 is 4% ahead of the Vega 64 at 1080p, lowering slightly to an 1.3% lead at 1440p. 12.6 TFLOPS vs 10.6 TFLOPS Let’s quickly take a look at the performance of our two most powerful cards: Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition and AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64. Vega is trading blows with the GTX 1080 right now using unrefined, problematic drivers. Looks like the game requires a large amount of GPU memory, and doesn't necessarily need the highest end GPU. So this is a tie. Assassin’s Creed Odyssey was tested with the built in benchmark using very high settings.