PCMark may not be the most demanding benchmark, but its workloads seem typical of how the middle of the bell curve of users will experience PC performance. In fact, the Vega 8 spends just half a second beyond 33.3 ms in this test—a figure you’d barely notice in practice over the course of our one-minute test run. Even the i7-7700HQ delivered crackling and popping with no voices of polyphony in play. They run hot, and are extremely bulky. Price and performance details for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U can be found below. Re: What is the Ryzen 2500u frequency range? Let’s kick off our testing with a quick look at the main memory performance from these systems using the built-in benchmarks from the AIDA64 utility. Probably closer to 15W without them. There's also rumors of a Dell Inspiron that's gonna have it. GPU is a clean-sweep. AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) x 1, 8192 MB, 64-bit Windows 10} The Alienware 13 R3 playing host to our Core i7-7700HQ is my personal system and was not provided by a manufacturer for evaluation. Based on 73,623 user benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U and the Intel Core i7-1065G7, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,276 CPUs. Intel Core i3-1005G1 vs AMD Ryzen 3 4300U: 18. Based on 220,891 user benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U and the Intel Core i5-8250U, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,276 CPUs. CPU Hash would seem to deliver a resounding win for the Ryzen 5 2500U, but remember that the Zen architecture supports Intel’s SHA Extensions. Entry-level gamers can generally be assured of a smooth and fluid Rocket League experience at these settings. To be fair, results like this indicate something pathological is going on with the test case/driver/etc, not really anything about the hardware… like OS paging memory every frame or something (Witcher) or just immature vulkan driver (DOOM). In the single-threaded portion of the benchmark, the Ryzen 5 2500U beats out the Speed Shift-less i5-7200U, and it only narrowly trails the Core i5-8250U and i7-7700HQ. Svelte. We've managed to get our hands on one of the only Ryzen Mobile laptops in the wild – the HP Envy x360 – to look at how AMD’s latest mobile silicon performs. Even if it’s not turning in playable frame rates, on average, the Vega 8 IGP is at least flirting with them. CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB FPS EFPS YouTube *NEW* COMPARE BUILD TEST ABOUT × COMPARE. Up to 4.5GHz. This does bring up the note though that it’s probably interesting to do a few of the benchmarks on battery power as well just as a sanity check if nothing else. Honestly what else do you expect from the AMD graphics driver teams? AMD Ryzen 5 – Test Setup. AM4 alone is not an assurance that a chip will have all its levers and dials exposed. But from a “convenient” perspective of using OneNote, surfing the web (using stylus + touch: touch to pan with hovering stylus to see tooltips, etc. That improved precision seems essential for a thermally-restrictive environment like a laptop chassis. If one of AMD’s partners can get a Ryzen 5 2500U into a thin-and-light laptop with a similar SSD and RAM configuration for around $600, we’ll really be talking. Max Boost Clock. Unless otherwise noted, all tests were conducted with display resolutions of 1920×1080 and refresh rates of 60 Hz. It’s a good chip, I wonder if the R7 2700U at a 25W TDP can catch it. DDR4-2400.). Dota 2 has a reputation for running on everything, even Intel integrated graphics, thanks to a wide and forgiving range of graphics options. Performance of the main processing part of the Ryzen 5 2500U is in line with corresponding Intel CPU – the 8th Generation Core i5-8250U. Considering the TDP, and only using shared system memory, it would be a very good level of performance. For 15W, assuming that the power draw does work out similar to Intel, I think what we’re getting is pretty good. Considering the huge TDP difference, the lack of dedicated memory, and the performance disadvantage the vega GPU is working with on the CPU side I think it did pretty well. The 2500U is 15W-ish total. With that in mind, the Ryzen 5 2500U beats out the dual-core i5-7200U, but it can’t close the gap in Euler3D performance that typifies AMD CPUs versus their Intel competitors. I guess I was hyped over the initial rumours that Raven Ridge GPU would have 704 shaders. Or just using Cinebench as a stresser? It might be held back by bandwidth, but I would still expect 25% at least. I think you’re right. To simulate a demanding workload, we tested each CPU with a 24-bit depth and 96-KHz sampling rate, and at two ASIO buffer depths: a punishing 64 and a slightly-less-punishing 128. For all that, I wouldn’t read too much into these chips’ performance with Dota 2‘s Fastest preset. Archived. I selected a blend of medium and low settings to really give these IGPs a workout with this demanding title. The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark. Based on 49,281 user benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U and the Intel Core i3-8109U, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,276 CPUs. Outside of its wins in Blender and Cinebench, the Ryzen 5 2500U hits multithreaded parity with the i5-8250U more often than not, though whether that parity will hold outside of a 15-inch notebook with plenty of metal casing and an aggressive fan remains to be seen. iGPU wise, it wins against intel but the gap is not as big as what I was expecting. Overall, AMD finally has the competitive CPU cores it’s so desperately needed to go with the powerful graphics processors in its APUs, but for the middle of the bell curve, single-threaded performance and snappiness still matters most. These things are just too late to market. Well, these numbers aren’t quite what I expected. (That is assuming though the mobile ryzen actually competes efficiency-wise in low-load / idle scenarios, that is it must have similar runtime – aside from performance that’s the most important metric for a mobile cpu, and some would probably put that as more significant than performance even.). price and performance is one of the biggest challenges that monitor manufacturers face in today’s ever-evolving world of display tech, which is why it’s nice to see companies like LG beginning to find more unique niche [urlhttp://www.furniture-appliances-ca.com/2018/01/lg-34uc89g-gaming-monitor-review.html%5B/url. We can never end our judgment at looks alone, though, and choosing a mechanical hard drive, no matter how good, as the primary storage device in any computer is an unfortunate decision in 2017. How hot did the device feel? Terms of Use Privacy Policy Change Ad Consent Advertise. I think AMD shows well here. TECHSPOT : Tech Enthusiasts, Power Users, Gamers, TechSpot is a registered trademark. AMD is building the Ryzen 5 2500U on a 14 nm production process, the transistor count is unknown. The benchmark reports both a rays-per-second and time-to-completion figure, and we’re reporting the time-to-completion result. Why not run the standard TR laptop battery life Browserbench? The digital-content-creation portion of this test covers three phases: photo editing tasks with large raw files from a range of DSLRs (some parts of which are OpenCL-enabled), video editing across both CPU and OpenCL code paths, and rendering and visualization of 3D models. Anyone know if that’s in the cards? This would be 10W consumption over that time to flatten the battery. 2 years ago. AMD Ryzen 5 2500U. Ryzen 5 2500u is the tech enthusiast in the 2017. The Radeon’s significantly spikier graph and higher 99th-percentile frame time don’t paint as favorable a picture for its performance, but hey—this is integrated graphics we’re talking about. For common web-browsing and office tasks, Intel CPUs would still seem to have a substantial edge in responsiveness and snappiness. With four Zen CPU cores and eight threads, plus as many as 640 Radeon Vega compute units, the Ryzen 5 2500U and Ryzen 7 2700U stuff a ton of potential computing horsepower into their 15W TDPs. For information about the Envy x360’s battery life, refer to our separate article published after this piece hit the wires. CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB FPS EFPS YouTube *NEW* COMPARE BUILD TEST ABOUT × COMPARE. That’s because the 2500U’s SIMD units are half as wide as those of the i5-8250U’s, so even with a core-count and potential clock-speed advantage, we should only expect the AMD chip to end up slightly ahead of the i5-7200U. We perform our test with games on the HP ENVY x360, the results are in line with this type of product, the AMD Vega 8 GPU, a superior model compared to the Intel integrated solution that allows us to play quite demanding titles if we adjust resolution and quality settings. 45W i5-7300HQ bile AMD'nin daha az güç tüketen işlemcisinden %5-10 oranında daha yavaş. The Ryzen 5 4500U is over 80% faster than the Ryzen 5 3500U, albeit with a 4W increase to power in our test configuration thanks to Lenovo’s weird settings. There’s more to Ryzen Mobile, but we’re here to test the thing, not dissect it further. 30 seconds of investigation with CPU-Z and Intel’s Extreme Tuning Utility confirms that the 14″ Acer i5-8250U system is most definitely limited to 15W. Also, I am sorry that I was being an ass earlier with the whole “take down the review” thing. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U: 18. The mobile Zen CPU part seems to be performing better than expected. Without a doubt, the Ryzen 5 2500U and Ryzen 7 2700U are AMD’s best and most competitive mobile APUs ever. The Radeon is thoroughly outclassed at these settings, so gamers will want to stick with lower settings, less eye candy, or both approaches to keep frame rates playable and frame delivery smooth-ish. There is some weird behavior when ruining VLC. eventually be cheaper than the Intel CPU and Nvidia discrete chip combo? ADD TO PC BUILD. etc. The app can take advantage of AVX2 instructions on compatible CPUs. AMD Ryzen™ 5000 Series processors power the next generation of demanding games, providing one of a kind immersive experiences and dominate any multithreaded task like 3D and video rendering 3, and software compiling. Graphics . Not good for benchmarks, but life goes on. Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U w . Power consumption would be interesting, though, across multiple clock speeds (from 2.2 to 4GHz, assuming both chips can make it that far). His machine is in no way configured with single channel memory. The usefulness of Javascript benchmarks for comparing browser performance may be on the wane, but these collections of tests are still a fine way of demonstrating the real-world single-threaded performance differences among CPUs. would a dual-graphics solution even work splitting the load between GCN and Vega? We chose the “bmw27” test file from Blender’s selection of benchmark scenes to put our CPUs through their paces. You could add a “Current Leecher Repay Score” (measured in computing hours, of course) to your reviews. The PhotoWorxx test uses AVX2 instructions on all of these chips. I personally use SharpCap, BackyardEOS, StarTools, DSS, PIPP, Gimp 2.9.6 and many other astro photography tools, and this laptop blows away an HP 8650W workstation with an i-7 3820QM and an ZBook G2 with an i-7 4810MQ processor (both with SSDs) as well as a Lenovo P51 with an i7-7820HQ processor and all these with 16GB Ram and higher clock speeds. The HP Envy x360 and the Acer Swift 3, both also powered by an AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, show the possibilities. Still, it could be worse. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information. We’d still like to see less variance, but it’s clear that the MX150 is still delivering a different class of experience than the Vega 8 in this title. Most impressively, this rather beastly system is just 4.75 lb (2.15 kg) and slips into a body just 0.77″ (19.6 mm) thick. That may create awkward results where a faster chip is slower, depending on how resources are apportioned. Best of luck to them. Posted by. )… Stylus + Touch is an incredible experience. Coupled with the fact that HP generally makes low efficiency laptops, it won’t impress. Not to mention the battery life figures that are coming out where even trivial 1080p video playback sucks hardcore power. test.result. 16 # of Threads. $760 for this same system with a 256GB SSD upgrade is an immeasurably better starting position for the Envy x360 and its Ryzen 5 2500U. This is a stress test designed to really throw the differences in processing power among these IGPs into stark relief. Regardless, when it comes to comparing laptop CPUs, I still think it’s crucial that the same laptop is used to ensure that there are as few variables as possible, but as I don’t have any direct evidence that the Acer Swift has a thermal advantage, I won’t push any further. Gaming test encyclopedia (+70 Games in alphabetical order) Video. The Vega 8 IGP gets off to a strong start with Rocket League. The AMD chip pulls about even with the Core i5-8250U and its freshly-doubled core count in this test. This is AMDs attempt at a mid-range Zen APU and for a mid-range APU I was actually pretty impressed. Nothing about these mobile CPUs is unlocked, so faster RAM will likely run at the highest multiplier the processor supports by default (i.e. The Ryzen 5 2500U from AMD is found in laptops exclusively, and shouldn't be confused with the desktop Ryzen 5 2400G APU (Accelerated Processing Unit) that … I seem to recall years of propaganda telling us about how AMD literally invented the concept of slapping graphics cores onto a chip and how Intel could never compete… ever! The AMD Ryzen 5 2500U is a "Zen" processor.Some of the prominent capabilities of the processor include SSE 4.2 + AVX + AVX2 + AES + AMD SVM + RdRand + FSGSBASE + BMI2.Prominent impacted bugs/vulnerabilities of the processor include Spectre V1, … Hmm, kind of figures on the GPU side, the best hope was catching the MX150, but that has dedicated memory going for it, IGPs are hard pressed for memory bandwidth contention. This is all different processors such as a rather old. All GPUs will fall into pathological behavior when pushed too far outside their operating parameters so really the only takeaway here is “Witcher is unplayable on that system”, after which point the details are mostly noise and obviously don’t generalize to any other test case, as those test cases themselves indicate .